ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG
Never available again
View alternatives in the sidebar
Choose your monitor
27 inches - Quad HD - 240Hz - OLED
Choose your monitor
View alternatives in the sidebar
27 inches - Quad HD - 240Hz - OLED
Choose your monitor
Product number | 963097 | |
|---|---|---|
Manufacturer code | 90LM0AH0-B01A70 | |
Brand | ASUS | |
Processing of your defect | Via Coolblue | |
Old product returned for free |
Screen size | 26,5 inches | |
|---|---|---|
Recommended display resolution | 2560x1440 | |
Sharpness | Quad HD (1440p) | |
Aspect ratio | Standard (16:9) | |
Refresh rate | 240 Hz | |
Response time | 0,03 ms | |
Panel type | OLED | |
Brightness | 450 cd/m2 | |
Local dimming | ||
HDR support | ||
Contrast ratio | 1500000 | |
Touchscreen | ||
Type of HDR | DisplayHDR 400 True Black, HDR10 | |
Screen reflection | Glossy | |
Blue light filter | ||
Flicker-free technology | ||
Color space | DCI-P3, sRGB | |
sRGB color coverage percentage | 135 % | |
Color depth | 1 billion colors (10-bit) | |
Adaptive Sync | ||
Type of adaptive sync | FreeSync, FreeSync Premium, G-Sync Compatible | |
Resolution width | 2560 pixels | |
Resolution height | 1440 pixels | |
Anti-reflection type | Anti glare | |
Horizontal viewing angle | 178 ° |
Weight | 6,7 kg | |
|---|---|---|
Color | Black | |
Including stand | ||
Material | Metal, Plastic | |
Cable management | ||
Appearance | Gaming | |
Curved |
Number of HDMI connectors | 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Number of headphone jacks | 1 | |
Type of headphone connection | 3.5mm (TRS) | |
Number of Female Standard DisplayPort 1.4 ports | 1 | |
Number of female standard USB-A ports | 2 | |
Female standard USB-A port version | 3.2 | |
Number of female 3.5mm TRS Audio Jack ports | 1 | |
Number of female standard USB-B (3.0 form) ports | 1 | |
Type of USB port | Standard USB-A, Standard USB-B (3.0 form) | |
Number of USB ports | 2 | |
Suitable for daisy chaining | ||
USB-C dock |
Included by default | DisplayPort cable, HDMI cable |
|---|
Adjustable in height | ||
|---|---|---|
Tiltable | ||
Pivotable stand | ||
Pivot function | ||
VESA mount option | ||
VESA mount | 100x100mm |
Energy label | F | |
|---|---|---|
Energy consumption standby | 0,3 W | |
Energy consumption active | 25,5 W | |
Energy consumption per 1000h | 24 kWh | |
Annual energy consumption | 35,04 kWh | |
Annual energy costs | 14,02 euros |
Built-in speakers | ||
|---|---|---|
Webcam | ||
Split screen | ||
Kensington lock |
Recommended for use | Gaming, Image editing and graphic design, Internet, email, and text processing, Photo editing, Video editing, Watching movies in 4K, Watching movies in Full HD |
|---|
Our digital expert will help you, but it can sometimes make mistakes, like humans do.
According to our monitor expert
Enjoy sharp images thanks to the Quad HD resolution.
With a 240Hz refresh rate, you can play fast-paced games smoothly, which makes the monitor suitable for professional gaming.
Enjoy lifelike colors on the OLED display.
To get the maximum refresh rate of 240 hertz, you can connect the monitor with DisplayPort.
Without a curved screen, the gameplay feels less immersive.
5 stars
14
4 stars
4
3 stars
0
2 stars
0
1 star
0
Installation ease
Image quality
Price-quality ratio
Design
I was just hesitating between 3 monitors. The consideration was: do I go for the best picture or for competitive play + excellent picture (balanced)?
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q5P
Ultimately, I ruled out the MSI, even though it was cheaper but used older OLED technology.
I didn't choose the 2K 500Hz 0.3ms Gigabyte because I considered picture quality to be very important, and 240Hz 0.3ms is actually sufficient for competitive play, but I am still curious about the Gigabyte since the difference between 2K and 4K ultimately doesn't seem that big. However, 2K is easier to render at higher frames, whereas with 4K I have to upscale everything with FSR4 (because I use AMD). I am finally getting the most out of my GPU and am less CPU-bound due to the higher resolution, and ultimately the FPS doesn't differ that much.
Regarding the AMD 9070XT, I do have to warn that the card does not support 80GB/s and only achieves 54GB/s, meaning DSC is used and subsequently operates at 40GB/s with compression, but this shouldn't matter for latency or image quality.
My hardware:
5950X running PBO with negative voltage curve (230W)
9070XT +10% Pwr (370W), VRAM on fast timings + increased memory clock and negative voltage (roughly comparable to an Nvidia RTX 5080)
I think this is the minimum required to get the most out of this monitor, and I recommend going with Nvidia if you want to reach the full 80GB/s on the DP port, but unfortunately, they are currently a lot more expensive. The included cables are of mediocre quality, so pay close attention to this.
Lester
7 May 2026
Automatically translated from Nederlands
I'm coming from an IPS monitor myself, huge difference
Justin
6 January 2026
Automatically translated from Nederlands
I like the monitor in itself, I tried 500hz and is soo smooth, in the beginning like 4k user was difficult to play in 2k as a downgrade but after a few match and some monitor settings is ok , 2k is perfect for competitive gaming and 4k for Singleplayer or Story mode games.
Inf3cted
11 September 2025
